Catholics staged false dating shroud

posted by | Leave a comment

group initially planned to conduct a range of different studies on the cloth, including radio-carbon dating. The six labs that showed interest in performing the procedure fell into two categories, according to the method they utilised: In 1982, the S. The blind-test method was abandoned because the distinctive three-to-one herringbone twill weave of the shroud could not be matched in the controls, and a laboratory could thus identify the shroud sample.

Gove consulted numerous laboratories which were able at the time (1982) to carbon-date small fabric samples. [...] The pressure on the ecclesiastic authorities to accept the Turin protocol have almost approached illegality.

The remaining sample, measuring 81 mm × 16 mm (3.19 in × 0.63 in) and weighing 300 mg, was first divided in two equal parts, one of which was preserved in a sealed container, in the custody of the Vatican, in case of future need.

The other half was cut into three segments, and packaged for the labs in a separate room by Dr Tite and the archbishop.

On September 28, 1988, British Museum director and coordinator of the study Michael Tite communicated the official results to the Diocese of Turin and to the Holy See.

In a well-attended press conference on October 13, Cardinal Ballestrero announced the official results, i.e.

As reported in Nature, Professor Bray of the Instituto di Metrologia 'G.

An outer strip showing coloured filaments of uncertain origin was discarded.

The actual provenance of these threads is uncertain, as Gonella was not authorized to take or retain genuine shroud material, Raymond Rogers stated in a 2005 article that he performed chemical analyses on these undocumented threads, and compared them to the undocumented Raes threads as well as the samples he had kept from his STURP work.

He stated that his analysis showed: "The radiocarbon sample contains both a gum/dye/mordant coating and cotton fibers.

group published the list of tests to be performed on the shroud; these aimed to identify how the image was impressed onto the cloth, to verify the relic's purported origin, and to identify better-suited conservation methods. We are faced with actual blackmail: unless we accept the conditions imposed by the laboratories, they will start a marketing campaign of accusations against the Church, which they will portray as scared of the truth and enemy of science.

lack of blindness in the measurements is a rather insubstantial reason for disbelieving the result."(t)he Church must respond to the challenge of those who want it to stop the process, who would want us to show that the Church fears the science.

Leave a Reply

chelsea dating flower show tiscali